Hi all, Brian here. I’ll be live blogging the event through the day. I hope I provides a little insight into how we learn about VLE development, both technical and in terms of pedagogy.
1:51 – Dr Ross Mackenzie, Strategic Development Manager, The Open University
Back again, we had a little blog trouble. Second session of the day.
Open university began in 2005 deciding to invest in Moodle.
They tend to contribute t0 main releases. He’s Scottish so tends to name OU Moodle releases after scotch whiskeys. They juddle about three releases together at a time.
What sort of release cycle do we see with OU Moodle? They’ve made over 2000 modifications. They try to keep it as stable as they can. Regular requirements gathering and feedback inform how development works. Regular re-prioritisation.
What has OU learned?
- NO BETA releases
- Release early and often – commit to your release cycle
- Your VLE is never finished – there will always be more to do. Helps to be surrounded with good ideas. Thats what drives Moodle development.
- Never underestimate the traffic. There will always be a bottleneck somewhere. Students are coming back more and more and spending more time.
- Keep evangelising. Tell people what you’re doing, what the system can and will do, and where you’re going. This will allow them to use what they have
Some stats:
- 5330 sites on VLE, 579 live
- 648,000 users in database. 180,000 active
- In 24hr period 35,000 – 50,000 unique users
- Concurrency? Maybe 2000-2500
The number will go up. They always go up.
How to adjust?
- 5 web servers load balanced – 1 for cron activities
- all Linux based
- backed up by 2 parallel clusters NFS
- You can add more web servers, but the real bottleneck at the moment is the SAN
How we structure development: Development > technical testing > user testing > live production
Google apps for Education – the OU are working with them on this. This is a key thing for Guildford as well. We’ll be looking at this in depth.
A Dashboard is being developed for Moodle as well – allows lecturers to see at a glance central things .
Moodle 2.0
Conditional release of materials will be available . Localisation is a bit of an issue, especially in terms of moving from 1.9 to 2.0. They need to look at options. One of them is to ignore Moodle 2. Another is to adopt it piecemeal. From a Guildford perspective this is not so much an issue, as we’re starting fresh.
Learning and teaching systems road map used by the OU
- iPhone/Android phone site version
- More cloud-based computing
- much more – see the vide0.
Critical thing – whenever we come up with a new idea, they start working with them to spec what they want to do. Feedback has made for a much better specification.
The web site for MoodleMoot 2010 can be found here: http://moodlemootuk2010.org.uk/
10:15 -Professor Geoffrey Crossick, Warden of Goldsmith College and Deputy Vice Chancellor of the University of London.
And we’re off!
The university of London adopted Moodle as their VLE as it was a unique solution. Goldsmiths College was part of the early community of users. They needed to develop a VLE that meet challenges for the future. They shared their experiences with others, which was considered a very valuable exercise. They have 6000 users accessing 12,000 courses accessing 6 million pages a month
4 Proprietary and 2 open source solutions were considered. Pedagogical issues were the winning consideration for Moodle. Integrating it with student services, assessment services. Students value the VLE at goldsmith – which is encouraging. They ask for more.
Educational studies – interacting with schools and between students. Case study resources. Excellence in teaching broadcast reward given. VLE is basis of collaborative working. Psychology tutorial in plagerism to encourage good practice. Moving into educationally disadvantaged backgrounds.
Goldsmith has embraced Moodle, and its changed the way in which teaching and learning is developed.
Radical changes in education were inevitable before the crisis. The expanding model of education is unaffordable. Expansion from 8 per cent in university to 43 per cent in university. Either big increase in resources, or more differentiated model of higher education.
We will see a much more highly differentiated HE/FE sector. Private commercial providers will take on a bigger role as funding gets lower and fees get higher. Governments will encourage it. HE will expand, but in a more affordable way. Work based-learning, accreditation will take more precedence.
For the rest of society, online learning will not take place as an enhancement, but as a key mode of delivery. VLEs will become crucial. The challenge will be how to maintain the current momentum of learning enhancement when the key driver will be the attraction that it seems to be cheaper.
Individualisation of Information. Does this mean private learning? Caution is advised. Every generation believes that its technological change is epochal – what people do is appropriate technology to their social purpose.
The character of education has not changed – people will continue to meet to exchange knowledge. The quality of knowledge will become key.
Distopian vision for learning. Content will in theory be available anywhere. But how do you make money form it? A future in which so much info is available, but not made available as there is no money to be made from it .
The future of access to learning can be very problematic. Whatever happens,. Moodle and VLEs will be crucial to that future .
10:27 – Professor Sugata Mitra, Newcastle University
He’s a Physicist. As a political scientist, I quite like this. Technical delays, please stand by….
Professor Mitra is behind the book “slumdog millionaire” and is possessed of impressive sideburns.
Everywhere on earth, there are places good teachers won’t go. his project is called the hole in the wall.
It
s hard to have good computer teachers because they tend to gravitate towards high paid teaching job.
So what happens when you put a computer in a slum, outdoors? We figure a laptop would last 20 mins in London, outdoors.
He put a computer and a touchpad in the wall, and bricked it in. Like a large ATM. What will happen? Steal it? break it? In 1999 an 8 year old boy was teaching a 6 year old girl how to browse. Cut to video. So whats going on here? Someone might have stopped and showed them – if only for a few minutes. Did this happen? Lets put it in a place where no support is possible. Northern Indian village. Put in local school. No English, no English teacher. Very very rural. New video of results. Translation: after three months 12 year old boy and 3 year old girl – asked for faster processor and better mouse.
How do you know all this? They said, you gave us a machine that worked only in English, so we taught ourselves English. If you teach them the language they will learn to use the machine. the child uses positives to get it done .The Adult says why they can’t.
We teach learners that they need teachers .
23 villages in a funded project. India was a good place for this – lots of ethnic diversity, climates, made for a good sample size. Took five years to do this .
Conclusions: groups of children can use the Internet to learn on their own, irrespective of who or where they are. The charts show a straight upward curve. An office secretary would get a 42 per cent score on a windows machine. The kids got 40 per cent. posh school in New Deli under same conditions in traditional schooling produced the same results. This embarrassed him a little. What are teachers for? Providing the computer in the school didn’t help. It put them on guard. If you put it in public, make the screen big and visible to passers by (open to all) then all misuse is controlled by society. much better than using software to manage behavior. In a public space there were no problems.
200-300 children can become computer literate in 3 months with 1 computer. That’s astonishing. Its a good story. Day 1 – big rush of kids ,lots of fights, then bullies take over. Thankfully bullies can’t figure it out and give up. Then the 8 yr old hackers take over . Then the 10-12 year old girls invent administration and management. The whole structure is designed for kids of a certain age – construction sets it up so only small hands and short kids can use it. The cost is about 3 US cents a day. The change in the culture is irreversible and profound. He could monitor the computer from New Delhi and put a note above the computer saying so. In 10 years hardly any computer was damaged.
So what happens if you give them more than a hole in a wall? In 2002 in Hedroba in southern India, where private schools for the poor were widespread. They promise to teach good quality english. knowing english makes a big difference. They cannot get native English speakers. The teachers speak Telegoo (Can’t spell it) this accent is very hard to decipher, and makes getting a job harder.
He gave the kids in this school a computer and a speech-to-text translator. You have to train the computer in your own accent. He trained it to British neutral and blocked the training feature out. Brought it to them and told them to speak into it. It produced gibberish. You have to make yourself understood. They asked “how”? He said “I don’t know”
They managed to train themselves.
Children in self-organised groups can take on self training, art and maths on their own, if you give them basic equipment.
He took on a question- can groups of children complete their schooling on their own? If they can’t, lets see it not happen. Let’s do an experiment where we should there are things children cannot teach themselves.
Question: Can Tamil speaking children learn biotechnology in English on their own?
So he put in a hole in the wall computer in Jan, 2006 in Kuppan. Parents are illiterate, many dead after tsunami. Downloaded material on biotech from internet and get 26 children aged 10-16 and told them it was quite difficult and they probably wouldn’t get it . He then left. two months later he came back. He pre-tested them beforehand. asked what they learned – they said nothing. How many times did they look at it? Answer: everyday. One little girl said, aside from the fact that improper replication of DNA causes disease, I learned nothing.
pretest – 0-30 percent in two months. Tamil speaking, impoverished village
post test 1 – 25 per cent
post test 2 – 30 percent
30 over cent is STILL a fail. So what would it take to make them pass?
So he got a friend to use the grandmother method – just encourage them, say how impressed you are. Two more months and they got to 50 per cent. The same as the schools in New Delhi.
So he went to the most remote place from home he’d been: Gateshead.
He took 32 ten year old and asked if they could make themselves into groups of 4. Each group can use one computer only. You can switch amongst groups, you can spy on other groups and claim it as your own. Y0u can cheat. He gave them 6 GCSE questions and said go to it. Then he left. Best group got all 6 questions right in 20 mins. The worst in 45. They did it effortlessly. They were all native English speakers.
Teacher said “so what?” They copied it from the net! He tried it again two months later and said you can not use computers or share results. They still got it right. The teachers haven’t been teaching the stuff – but the kids kept talking about it.
In Longbenton he asked what do you want to be when you grow up? Initial answers – footballers and fashion model. Entertainers were heroes. They don’t see anything that isn’t from TV. He then showed them www.ted.com and 8 different talks. They’d watch the film form their own groups of 4, with one boffin (just in case). Then they’ll log into one computer in groups of four. They’d invent methods to find things. After 8 weeks they’d changed their answers on what they wanted to be. Lesson it takes very little to change the3 ambitions of children.
Self organised learning environments. Hyderabad and Maharashtra and Newcastle. About 26. The holes in the wall have a little quiz with GCSE questions. he tells them its the most boring part. They go nuts for it and start Googling for the answer. We’ll see the result. It will get us to 30 per cent, but not to pass. We need a mediator.
Whoops, he didn’t write the book, he was just the inspiration.
He asked for grandmothers who had an hour to spare a week in a guardian article. He got 200, working by video link to India. Mediator is projected as a full size image. This became a socially acceptable system. He has a grand cloud he can beam in. They love the word beam.
Lesson: fault-tolerant tech, high speed broadband, self-organised learning as part of timetables. Curriculum based on questions. Clouds of mediators as part of faculty. Change in assessment. What is schooling? If a 10 year old can pass GCSE, what is learning?
That’s the end of t he first session. My fingers hurt. We’ll pick up soon. Conference gifted Moodle for 7-12 year olds to the professor.